165 Days: Pitfalls and Profits in Latin America Cross-Border E-Commerce

NextFin News — “A lot of Chinese people in Brazil have bulletproof glass installed on their cars.” That was the one thing Enki Technology founder Cheng Hai remembered most vividly from his recently concluded fact-finding trip to Brazil.

Public safety concerns are one of the stereotypes outsiders often hold about Latin America. But in Cheng Hai’s view, that stereotype is only skin-deep. He spent two weeks in Brazil without running into any safety issues at all—what boosted his confidence instead was the rapidly growing local demand for e-commerce.

After entering the Brazilian market in the first half of this year, Enki Technology used a distribution-heavy model to drive monthly revenue up 15-fold, while net profit margins have consistently held at 30%.

“If you’re doing legitimate business, what are you afraid of?” he shot back. “As long as you pay taxes locally and hire people, you’re valuable to the local government—and they’ll want you to come.”

This confidence isn’t unfounded. Amazon data showed that in the first quarter of this year, sales generated by new sellers in Brazil and Mexico were up 2x year-on-year versus new sellers last year; during Mexico’s Hot Sale campaign this year, new-seller sales were 4x the same period last year.

Zhang Qi, Vice President of Amazon China and Head of Emerging Markets for Amazon Global Selling, told Chuhai Cankao, “Mexico’s e-commerce penetration rate is expected to surpass the U.S. for the first time this year.”

At the policy level, signals have been equally encouraging. In May this year, the Brazilian government announced it would eliminate the 20% federal import tax on small parcels under US$50, and cut the tax rate on goods over US$50 but no more than US$3,000 from 60% to 30%.

Against the broader global backdrop of tightening policies on cross-border small parcels, Brazil has embraced cross-border e-commerce with a rare openness. This continent—China’s farthest—has become a blue-ocean market whose “potential is far beyond expectations.”

Surprise: 6x Growth on Day One

“Latin America is our fastest-growing overseas market,” Yuan Weigui, Head of Overseas E-commerce at IMOU (Lechange), told Chuhai Cankao.

Lechange is a consumer security company that was spun off from Dahua Technology, a major player in the security industry. In 2018, Lechange expanded overseas under the IMOU brand and entered the global market. Driven by the rapid growth of Latin America, IMOU Lechange’s overseas shipments accounted for as much as 77.1% in the first quarter of 2025.

After several years of operations, Yuan Weigui observed that last-mile logistics fulfillment for Latin American e-commerce is smoother, mobile payments are widely adopted, and consumers’ willingness to shop online is rising—making the local e-commerce environment increasingly favorable.”

She revealed, “Latin America has maintained high growth momentum over the past few years. During this year’s Prime Day campaign, IMOU’s first-day sales increased sixfold, which really showed us the strong consumption potential of the Mexican market.”

Zhang Qi summed up merchants’ common feedback after entering Latin America with the word “surprise.” “Some products feel like they’re doing well when they sell 10 units on a normal day, but during major promotions they can suddenly surge to 40 or 50 units. That kind of explosive growth makes people realize the opportunity here is bigger than they expected.”

In her view, many people mistakenly think that as more players enter, the pie gets sliced thinner. But Latin America is still in an incremental-growth phase: e-commerce penetration is rising quickly and the demographic dividend continues to be released. With more entrants, everyone can actually share in the dividends brought by overall market expansion.

As a distribution-style seller, Cheng Hai feels this “surprise” even more directly. Enji Technology entered Brazil this January, and its GMV has been doubling month over month; the return rate has held at around 3%, and net profit has remained at 30%. He noted that there still aren’t that many merchants in Brazil, and the market is still in a supply-short stage—so the distribution model is still working.

Yuan Weigui likewise believes a price war has not yet emerged in Latin America. She told us, “In any market, over time it’s inevitable to move into price wars and intense competition. But Latin America hasn’t reached its peak yet—it’s still in a phase of rapid development.” This has allowed IMOU to maintain mid-to-high-end brand pricing and profit margins, without having to throw off its rhythm just to chase volume.

GameSir, the game controller brand, has also felt this wave of momentum. During this year’s World Cup, the excitement around the matches directly boosted sales of related gaming peripherals.

According to data from the Mercado Libre platform, during the World Cup period Brazil saw more than 2.2 million searches for smart TVs; searches for green spray paint products jumped 642%; non-alcohol beer searches surged 985%. In Mexico, searches for portable ice buckets rose as high as 492%. The entire consumer market was heating up along with fans’ эмоtions.

However, Latin America is by no means a monolith. Zhao Weilin, COO of GameSir, specifically noted: “In price-sensitive Latin American markets, consumer behavior in Mexico is very close to that of the U.S., but Brazil is even more price-sensitive and has a more segmented consumer base.”

This divergence shows up directly in product strategy and user segmentation. For GameSir, whose core products are mobile gaming controllers, Mexico is instead a market where it pushes Xbox-licensed controllers as the main offering, with other mobile-game and PC-gaming products as complements; in Brazil, it places more emphasis on highly compatible PC controllers and mobile controllers, aligning with the local preference for mobile-first gaming.

A 165-day Cash-collection Cycle

On the flip side of the pleasant surprises are the very real operational challenges—especially in Brazil.

“In the past, localization wasn’t necessary. Now it’s required—registering a local company, applying for a local tax ID, stocking inventory locally. That threshold has kept many small sellers who just wanted to test the waters out,” Zhao Weilin analyzed.

Holding inventory locally has become standard practice for cross-border e-commerce in Brazil. GameSir, IMOU, and Enji Technology have all opted to stock goods in local Brazilian warehouses. But behind the cost of inventory, the tougher problem to untangle is the supply-chain management and cash-flow pressure caused by long-haul ocean shipping.

It takes 60 days for a factory to produce a batch of goods; shipping from China to Brazil by sea takes 30–45 days; customs clearance takes 2 weeks to a month; and it takes another month to sell through the batch. All told, it takes 165 days before the payment for that batch shows up on the books.

Goods stuck at sea, and products piled up in overseas warehouses still awaiting clearance, once left both merchants and local consumers anxious. Many merchants told us they were “robbing Peter to pay Paul.”

Zhao Weilin also admitted, “By stretching out our inventory cycle in Brazil, we didn’t manage to fully plug the hole until the second quarter of this year.”

Cheng Hai ran a more detailed calculation from another angle: for the same shipment to Brazil, a fast vessel can arrive in about 28 days, with clearance completed in roughly a month—but it costs about five percentage points more than slow shipping. Choosing the cheaper slow vessel can save a few points in freight, but the cargo can end up stuck at sea for as long as two months, leaving capital tied up in transit and unable to move.

“If your cash is tight and you need to get in and start selling fast to generate income, the interest cost of that extra delay may end up higher than the few points you pay for a fast ship,” Cheng Hai explained to Going Global Reference.

For large sellers with ample capital, this is a choice that can be calmly modeled; for small and mid-sized sellers, it often determines survival.

After-sales service is another invisible money pit. Zhao Weilin said that Brazil currently lacks a mature after-sales system; returned goods can only be handled in tiers through local warehouses—items that can be fixed are repaired, and those that can’t are written off. To keep after-sales costs under control and reduce the return rate, GameSir has tried to head off return issues in advance by strengthening product testing, addressing the joystick-drift pain point, improving order-fulfillment timeliness, and increasing interaction and communication within its user communities.

Certification, taxes, and hiring are also three hard hurdles in Brazil.

Certification for electronic products in Brazil typically takes three to four months—much slower than in markets such as Europe and the United States—stretching out the time-to-market for new products. Brazil also has three separate layers of taxation—federal, state, and municipal; moving goods across state lines incurs at least a 4% circulation tax, which passively raises the bar for capabilities such as tax and financial compliance, pricing strategy, and profit accounting. The Brazilian government also requires that the proportion of locally hired employees must not be lower than two-thirds. A high “Brazilianization rate,” combined with strict local labor-protection laws, means higher labor and workforce-management costs for companies.

The complexity of tax laws has limited many sellers’ operational reach in Brazil. Cheng Hai revealed that, like many other sellers, Enki Tech’s market operations in Brazil were limited to the São Paulo area, covering a population of 20 million; the broader inland market has always been a tough nut to crack.

“The rougher the seas, the pricier the fish.” That’s how Zhao Weilin summed up the paradox of high risk and high reward in the Brazilian market. He suggested that new sellers entering Brazil “be prepared for at least two to three years of long-term investment and patience,” learn how the Brazilian market works, and push through the stage of plugging holes.

Precisely because the barriers are high and compliance costs are steep, there still aren’t many players truly rooted in Brazil—ironically leaving room for brands willing to grind through the hole-plugging phase.

A One-Year Window: Chinese Brands and Mindshare in Latin America

As a distribution-style seller, Cheng Hai believed investments in Brazil can deliver immediate results, but as more and more merchants pour in, this window of dividend opportunity can only last for one year.

“At this stage, distribution still works and there’s still profit. A year from now, we’ll have to return to the track of premium, curated offerings and brand-building.” Drawing on his past experience opening up the Middle East and half a year operating in Brazil, Cheng Hai offered his outlook for the Brazilian market.

This window is not only for distribution-style sellers; it is also the window for brand merchants to build user mindshare in Brazil.

Zhao Weilin said, “Relying on the brand awareness GameSir built up in the U.S. market, our in-platform brand-search conversion rate can reach 10%. But in Brazil, brand awareness and identification haven’t taken shape yet, so we still have to rely on off-platform conversion.”

However, he believes this is precisely an opportunity for Chinese companies to build brand awareness in Latin America. Behind that opportunity lies a crucial difference. Zhao Weilin has observed that consumers in Europe and the United States tend to be highly loyal to legacy brands, whereas consumers in emerging markets such as Latin America and India don’t have that kind of attachment. Instead, they are more willing to embrace new and different brands—giving Chinese brands a comparatively level playing field at the starting line.

In this golden window for shaping brand mindshare, both IMOU and GameSir are trying—through localized products and marketing—to define the standard in their respective tracks and capture mindshare.

IMOU has found that in Latin America, more families live in self-built homes, and outdoor “home guarding” is a typical need. Consumers want multi-angle, long-range monitoring solutions to cover wider and larger spaces. In response, IMOU has tailored dual-camera and multi-camera solutions and launched security cameras that charge via solar power and support 24/7 uninterrupted operation. At the same time, to address storage overload caused by long-duration monitoring, IMOU compresses video files to reduce storage usage.

GameSir’s way of seizing this window has been localization in the truest sense.

One product detail illustrates the point well. A controller GameSir launched recently, the “P1,” was named based on a suggestion from community users: “Call it Taco—the product looks a lot like a taco.” Naming a product after a Mexican food reflects a level of trust that can only be built through deep communication with local users.

In addition, GameSir has partnered with local gaming KOLs in Mexico and Brazil to break into different communities. Leveraging Latin America’s strong sharing culture and love of social media, GameSir stays in close, in-depth contact with local users through private social-media communities. At the same time, it has bet on mobile gaming controller products, aligning with the trend in Latin America of skipping the PC era and embracing the mobile internet directly.

As overseas-expanding brands, IMOU and GameSir treat offline investment as just as important as online. Zhao Weilin noted that GameSir recently attended an industry trade show in Brazil and, together with local distributors, placed outdoor advertising. IMOU, meanwhile, has developed online and offline channels in parallel since it began its overseas expansion in 2018—and in places such as Venezuela and Colombia, it has even chosen to rely exclusively on offline channels.

Notably, in pricing, both IMOU and GameSir have maintained a mid-to-high-end brand positioning. As more Chinese brand-oriented sellers that succeeded in the United States enter Latin America, the globalization of “Made in China” is upgrading into the globalization of mid-to-high-end “Chinese brands.”

At the end of the visit, Zhang Qi summed it up for us: “Right now, Chinese cross-border sellers in Latin America are seeing two parallel trends. On the one hand, ultra cost-effective products that leverage China’s supply-chain advantages are continuing to gain momentum in the Latin American market; on the other hand, more and more Chinese brands are incorporating high-potential markets such as Latin America into their globalization strategy from the very start.”

Wholesale-listing sellers make money before they finish plugging the holes; brand merchants put down roots before the market fully matures. On this land that is farthest from China yet closest to opportunity, cross-border e-commerce seems to have found the last “Promised Land flowing with milk and honey.” (Author | Wang Lu)

更多精彩内容,关注钛媒体微信号(ID:taimeiti),或者下载钛媒体App

Continue Reading165 Days: Pitfalls and Profits in Latin America Cross-Border E-Commerce

Alibaba Bans Employees From Using Claude Code

TMTPOST — Chinese tech giant Alibaba has issued a ban to prevent its employees from using Anthropic’s Claude Code in workplace environments, starting on July 10.

The move follows internal assessments that flagged the AI coding assistant as “high-risk software” after reports it contained potential backdoors and mechanisms to detect China-linked users

Alibaba’s employees are required to uninstall products related to Anthropic, including multiple series of models such as Sonnet, Opus, and Fable, as well as Agent products including Claude Code. 

Since the beginning of this year, Alibaba had encouraged employees to adopt AI technology by not only introducing free quotas for internal models but also implementing a substantial reimbursement policy for the use of external models. Employees were free to choose external models such as Claude, GPT, and Gemini, with some programmers consuming quotas of up to several hundred dollars each week, frequently using Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Alibaba’s Qoder as their Agent tools. This “reverse ban” has cut off access to Claude.

The ban was related to Anthropic’s accusations. On June 10, Anthropic submitted a letter to the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, accusing Alibaba of using approximately 25,000 fake accounts to engage in over 28 million interactions with Claude between April 22 and June 5. This behavior was characterized as “industrial-grade model distillation attacks,” escalating the matter to a national security level.

In response, Anthropic significantly tightened its risk control strategies. Anthropic had previously made similar accusations against DeepSeek, the Moonshot, and MiniMax. In February of this year, Anthropic accused these three Chinese AI firms of conducting large-scale distillation attacks on Claude.

On June 24, Alibaba filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, suing the Department of Defense to have it removed from the “Chinese Military Companies List” (the 1260H list).

This list was published by the Department of Defense on June 8, including Alibaba, Baidu, BYD, and other companies. Although the list does not directly equate to formal sanctions, it raised concerns in the market about Alibaba’s ability to use cutting-edge American technology. Alibaba subsequently submitted detailed evidence to prove its innocence but received no response from the Department of Defense.

From late June to early July, Anthropic implemented a new wave of mass account bans on Claude, with many Chinese users being disabled without warning, affecting both personal subscriptions and team accounts. Accounts that were directly paid for through the Anthropic official website and deemed to have violated the rules were not refunded, and the success rate for appeals was extremely low.

Subsequently, some developers conducted reverse analysis and discovered that Claude Code had built-in a “covert trojan” system starting from version 2.1.91, released in April 2026. This system reads the local time zone and checks whether the proxy or custom API addresses contain keywords related to Chinese cloud providers, AI companies, or API proxy service providers, marking Chinese users by replacing punctuation marks in system prompts through steganography. Members of the Claude Code team later publicly acknowledged this “experimental” measure.

更多精彩内容,关注钛媒体微信号(ID:taimeiti),或者下载钛媒体App

Continue ReadingAlibaba Bans Employees From Using Claude Code

从比亚迪出来创业9年,他们准备要去港股敲钟了

(本文作者为 华夏能源网,钛媒体经授权发布)

文 | 华夏能源网

华夏能源网获悉,6月26日,大秦数字能源技术股份有限公司(以下简称“大秦数能”)向港交所提交上市申请书,国泰海通独家保荐。

大秦数能是一家年轻的储能厂商,注册成立于2017年,核心团队主要来自比亚迪。公司的核心业务为户储和工商储的研发和销售。根据弗若斯特沙利文的数据,以2025年出货量口径统计,公司位列全球第五大户用储能系统供应商。

当前,储能行业正迎来新一轮上升时期,户储和工商业储能也迎来利好。今年4月,工商储头部企业思格新能源(HK:06656)刚刚在港交所上市;本月,古瑞瓦特也正式递表港交所。如今,大秦数能也紧随而来,储能厂商掀起了一波赴港上市潮。

明星团队与明星资本

大秦数能的“灵魂”人物柳扬,毕业于吉林大学,目前在公司担任执行董事、董事会主席兼总经理。柳扬曾在比亚迪工作18年之久,离职前担任比亚迪光伏事业部销售总监。

柳扬直接持有大秦数能41.1%的股份,连同其控制的三个平台,合计控制大秦数能约59.04%的表决权。

大秦数能股权结构图(来源:招股书)

除了柳扬,大秦数能海外销售总监童建成,品牌及营销总监朱晓辉,副总经理、工商业ESS总监李程以及财务总监赵然志,均出身于比亚迪。

除了来自比亚迪的明星团队,大秦数能背后还有一众资本的支持。据不完全统计,自2022年起,公司已经至少完成四轮股权融资,累计融资至少11.3亿元。

其中,恒信华业是较早投资大秦数能的机构。2022年,公司分两次完成A、A+轮早期融资,由恒信华业独家领投。这两次融资,公司估值在半年内提升了近四倍。根据企查查信息,截至去年底,其还持有大秦数能7.7%的股份。

优山资本对大秦数能的支持力度也很大。

优山资本的核心团队出自中金,创始人、董事长陈十游是国内知名的私募大佬。2023年1月,大秦数能完成了B轮融资,领投方正是优山资本,钟鼎资本、东山精密(SZ:002384)、锦浪科技(SZ:300763)、清科创投等跟投。

同年6—7月,大秦数能又完成了C轮融资,B、C两轮优先股合计出资10.05亿元,中金资本旗下基金领投,明星美元基金路威凯腾(L Catterton)、锦秋基金、神骐资本等参与,投后估值达47.05亿元。

值得一提的是,2024年,受锂价暴跌、存货减值影响,大秦数能现金流岌岌可危。部分资本开始出逃,路威凯腾和陕西金财“清空”了股份。大秦数能陷入黑暗时期。

这时候又是优山资本站了出来。2025年12月,优山资本、国发创投、江苏海四达对大秦数能追加投资,缓解了公司的资金压力。这也是大秦数能提交IPO申请前的最后一次融资。

囤积电芯,连年亏损

尽管有着出身比亚迪的管理团队,和一众明星资本的支持,大秦数能的业绩却并不亮眼。招股书显示,在2023年和2024年,公司分别亏损了1.82亿元和3.78亿元。

值得注意的是,连续两年亏损的原因,主要来自高管团队的一次错误预判。

2021年开始,全球储能市场迎来强劲发展。当年,户储龙头派能科技(SH:688063)营收同比增加了84.21%;净利润也增长了15%。市场的高景气之下,2022年,大秦数能大量采购囤积电芯,为市场扩张准备“弹药”。

彼时,碳酸锂价格一路狂飙,带动储能电芯价格一路上涨,但大秦数能依旧不惜重金采购,数量足够生产28.4万台户用电池。

但到了2023年,行情急转直下。一方面,碳酸锂价格持续下滑,电芯价格也随之下降;另一方面,俄乌战争给欧洲带来的能源危机逐渐减弱,户储需求随之减弱。在高成本和低需求的压力下,大秦数能只好“亏本大甩卖”,以至于在2024年,公司的毛利率一度跌至-19.9%。

直到2025年,随着存货出清、碳酸锂价格回暖以及储能行业再次进入上升期,大秦数能才实现了扭亏为盈。当年,公司实现净利润1.25亿元。

角逐海外工商储

在招股书中,大秦数能称公司是国内较早布局海外储能市场的企业之一,自成立起采用全球化运营与本地化服务相结合的经营模式,目前已建立覆盖欧洲、亚太、美洲、非洲、中东等区域的分销网络,业务落地于全球数十个市场。

数据显示,2025年,大秦数能海外市场的收入占总收入的比重高达95.1%。

而在海外市场,大秦数能的工商储业务正高速增长。招股书显示,公司户用储能系统营收占比已从2023年的99%下降至2025年的75.7%。同期,工商业储能系统营收占比则从0.2%跃升至23.9%,业务重要性显著提升。另外,大秦数能工商储毛利率高达33.2%,显著高于户用储能系统的20.1%毛利率。

大秦数能产品结构表(来源:招股书)

值得一提的是,不久前,中信建投证券发布研报称,预计2026/2027年海外户储、工商储新增需求约45/58、16/26GWh,同比增长56%/28%、82%/63%。2029年起,多个市场的工商储需求将开始超过户储。

尽管市场前景较好,但大秦数能还面临着些挑战。

一方面,大秦数能过去户储市场的经验并不适用于工商储。大秦数能的户储海外市场主要为分销模式。数据显示,2023—2025年,公司通过分销商获得的收入在营收中的占比分别为86.4%、92.5%及98.2%。工商储主要以直销、客制化为主,需要直接对接企业……与户储经销商+标准化产品差异明显。另外,海外工商储市场准入及认证周期长、专业化要求高、资金占用规模大等,都与户储市场有着显著的区别。

另一方面,海外工商储市场的竞争愈加激烈。不仅有派能科技、德业股份(SH:605117)、比亚迪储能等较早进入海外工商储市场的厂商,也有鹏辉能源(SZ:300438)、思格新能源等新面孔的加入。

对于大秦数能来说,如果能打赢这场海外工商储市场的硬仗,未来的增长空间将进一步打开,站上港股将更有底气。

更多精彩内容,关注钛媒体微信号(ID:taimeiti),或者下载钛媒体App

Continue Reading从比亚迪出来创业9年,他们准备要去港股敲钟了

1块钱年薪拷问奈雪,不知道沪上阿姨的“打工皇帝”怎么看

(本文作者为 市象,钛媒体经授权发布)

文 | 市象,作者 | 艾题,编辑 | 古廿

“他也要靠工资生活。”

奈雪的茶股东会上,一名小股东提出了一个很不客气的问题:公司持续亏损,管理层工资却在增加,董事长赵林能不能把工资和业绩挂钩,只领一块钱年薪?

彭心解释,上市之后夫妻二人的股份一直没有减持,赵林也要靠工资生活,发一块钱并不现实。

数据显示,2025年赵林和彭心从奈雪领取的薪酬分别为137.2万元、172.8万元,合计310万元。

这场面,不知道沪上阿姨的“打工皇帝”周天牧怎么看。

2025年,沪上阿姨行政副总裁周天牧获得薪酬2573.2万元,是赵林、彭心夫妇的8.3倍,也超过了蜜雪集团董事长张红超的2408万元。

把两个场景放在一起,奶茶行业突然有了一点魔幻现实主义:亏损公司的老板,被股东劝着只拿一块钱;盈利公司的老板,一年只拿52.3万元,真正拿走2573.2万元的,是一名2022年才加入公司的职业经理人。

一块年薪是个假问题

拿职业经理人的工资和创始人的工资直接比较,意义并不大。

创始人的主要收益从来不是工资,而是股权和分红。沪上阿姨创始人单卫钧、周蓉蓉夫妇合计持股超过78%,2025年公司全年拟派息超过1.76亿元,接近八成将流向这对创始人夫妇。

他们不是只赚52.3万元,只是换了一个口袋收钱。

周天牧不同。作为职业经理人,他没有创始人的控股权,主要回报只能来自工资、奖金和股权激励。因此,真正值得讨论的不是他为什么比老板工资高,而是沪上阿姨为什么认为他值2573.2万元。

根据沪上阿姨2025年年报,周天牧的薪酬包括315.1万元工资、1121万元业绩花红、1125.7万元股份支付及11.4万元社会福利。

换句话说,2573.2万元里,固定工资只占12%左右,业绩奖金和股份支付占了87%。

这不是一笔单纯的工资,更是一笔激励金,周天牧的履历很适合沪上阿姨。

他在宝洁工作过八年,做过大中华区品类营销总监;随后进入维他奶,又在阿里巴巴负责口碑快消零售和超市生态业务。2022年5月,他加入沪上阿姨担任首席运营官,2023年成为执行董事兼副行政总裁。

外企教他卖快消品,阿里教他做平台,沪上阿姨则给了他一万多家加盟店。

周天牧加入时,沪上阿姨只有5307家门店,2025年末已经达到11449家;同期营收从21.99亿元增长到44.66亿元,净利润从1.49亿元增长到5.01亿元。

2025年,沪上阿姨营收增长36%,净利润增长52.4%,周天牧的薪酬增长57.4%。单看这三组数字,工资涨幅与利润涨幅基本一致。

从董事会的角度看,这笔钱并非毫无道理。周天牧任内,沪上阿姨完成上市、迈过万店门槛,营收翻倍,净利润增长两倍多。

按照总部的成绩单,他大概配得上这笔奖金。

问题是,沪上阿姨不只有一张成绩单。

奈雪亏在明面上,沪上阿姨赚在上游

2025年末,沪上阿姨11449家门店中,加盟店有11423家,直营店只有26家。

公司的44.66亿元收入中,36.16亿元来自向加盟商销售原料、食材和设备,占比81%;加盟服务收入6.9亿元,占比15.5%。两项加起来,加盟体系贡献了沪上阿姨96.5%的收入。

这意味着,沪上阿姨的客户不只是喝奶茶的人,更是开奶茶店的人。

门店开得越多,总部能够收取的加盟费越多,能够销售的设备和原料也越多。至于门店扣除房租、人工、平台佣金和促销补贴后还能剩下多少,并不会完整出现在上市公司的利润表里。

总部看门店数量,加盟商看银行卡余额。

2025年,沪上阿姨新开3654家加盟店,同时关闭1383家,关闭数量较2024年增加约40%。相当于每开出约三家新店,就有一家旧店离场。

更早披露的数据也不算轻松。2024年,沪上阿姨平均单店GMV从160万元下降到140万元,平均单店日均GMV从4270元下降到3753元。

总部的增长来自门店扩张,加盟商的收益却取决于单店能不能活下来。

一家新店开张,总部完成了招商、设备和首批原料销售;半年后门店关闭,剩下的房租、装修和库存损失,主要由加盟商承担。

开店计入高管的业绩,关店却可能只是加盟商的命运。

奈雪和沪上阿姨的区别,也不只是一个亏损、一个盈利。

奈雪长期以直营模式为主。门店生意不好,租金、人工和原料损耗会直接落进上市公司的报表。2025年,奈雪营收下降12%至43.31亿元,经调整净亏损2.41亿元,直营门店净关闭165家。

门店赚不到钱,奈雪总部也得跟着亏。

沪上阿姨则把绝大多数门店交给加盟商经营。总部主要负责品牌、供应链和运营系统,再通过销售原料及收取服务费赚钱。门店经营风险被分散到一万多个加盟商身上,上市公司仍然可以保持利润增长。

所以奈雪股东可以在会上指着赵林问:公司亏钱,你为什么不降工资?

沪上阿姨的加盟商却很难拿着自己亏损的门店账本,走进公司的薪酬委员会问一句:总部利润增长了,我赚到的钱在哪里?

奈雪的亏损很难看,但至少亏在明面上。加盟模式更高明的地方,是总部和门店甚至可以同时拥有两种截然不同的体感。

一边是万店、上市和利润新高,另一边是单店流水下降、促销侵蚀利润和超过千家门店关闭。

双方说的都可能是真的。

2573万元买的究竟是什么

职业经理人的2573.2万元年薪高不高,不能只看这个数字。

一个能够帮助公司完成上市、营收翻倍并建立万店网络的职业经理人,当然值这个价位。

真正的问题是,公司用什么指标定义他的成功。

如果考核指标只有营收、利润、门店数量和市场份额,那么沪上阿姨的激励机制相当有效。周天牧完成了任务,公司也兑现了奖金。

但对于一家96.5%收入依赖加盟体系的企业,高管考核还应该包括加盟店存活率、单店GMV、加盟商回本周期、中位数利润和库存损耗。

否则,所谓“与业绩挂钩”,挂住的只是总部业绩。

奈雪股东要求赵林领取一块钱年薪,多少带着一点情绪。公司经营出现问题,不会因为老板少领一百多万元就得到解决。

同样,周天牧拿2573.2万元,也不意味着沪上阿姨存在问题。

但在这笔钱发出去之前,至少应该回答一个问题:2025年关闭的1383家加盟店,算不算他的业绩?

一家门店开张,高管获得奖金;一家门店关闭,加盟商损失本金。如果最终是这样的分配,那么这套薪酬不是与业绩挂钩,而是与谁有权定义业绩挂钩。

“打工皇帝”当然可以年薪2573万元。

只是那1383家关掉的店,也应该在薪酬委员会里有一把椅子。

更多精彩内容,关注钛媒体微信号(ID:taimeiti),或者下载钛媒体App

Continue Reading1块钱年薪拷问奈雪,不知道沪上阿姨的“打工皇帝”怎么看

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

快科技7月4日消息,本月初,数码博主@6GHz 发布了名为《人去楼空?贾老板你人呢?全网首探法拉第未来美国工厂!》的探访视频,称FF洛杉矶工厂无人,仅剩贴纸和刹车片,引发“人去楼空”质疑

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

昨日,法拉第未来发布声明称,公司日前关注到近部分网络平台流传所谓“FF洛杉矶总部人去楼空”等不实信息。

FF位于汉福德的工厂并未关闭,此次系全球总部正常搬迁至洛杉矶硅滩(El Segundo),网传视频所拍摄地点为FF曾经位于Gardena市的旧总部,今年3月底开始不再由FF使用,所谓“FF洛杉矶总部人去楼空”的说法具有严重误导性,属于对公司正常办公地点搬迁事实的恶意歪曲。

法拉第未来声称,该视频具有严重误导性,不排除与非法做空者合谋以打压股价,已对视频取证并向平台发送律师函,保留起诉权利

在公开声明中,法拉第未来还透露,FF EAI机器人于今年2月底首次交付,截至6月底已累计交付242台,超额完成原定220台目标,基于当前业务进展持续超出预期,公司已再次上调全年出货目标,从1500台上调至2000台。

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

针对FF的回应,博主“6GHz”反指FF高管王佳伟涉嫌造谣,并称自己曾固定证据证明评论未被删除;同时他晒出了法拉第未来高管后台给自己点留言,称“均未邀请他去汉福德工厂参观,满嘴谎话了属于是 ​​。”

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

Continue Reading法拉第未来辟谣“总部人去楼空”并将起诉博主 后者硬刚回应!

华擎白色“太极”主板X870E首发4299元:万兆有线、内置Wi-Fi7无线网卡

快科技7月4日消息,华擎旗下首款纯白配色的“太极”系列主板——X870E TaiChi White现已正式上架,定价为4299元。

该主板定位AMD旗舰平台,通体采用白色涂装,覆盖正面PCB、接口区域及散热装甲,配合渐变RGB灯效,整体风格简约干净,专为纯白主题装机打造。

华擎白色“太极”主板X870E首发4299元:万兆有线、内置Wi-Fi7无线网卡

供电部分,主板搭载24+2+1相110A SPS智能供电方案,并配备独家1000µF 20K电容——相较前代的560µF,容量提升近一倍,使用寿命延长至20000小时,有效降低纹波、稳定输出电流,进一步增强系统在高负载下的稳定性。

同时,SPS智能供电阶段技术可独立监控并优化每相电源,实现更精准的能耗调控,为超频提供充足余量。

内存方面,X870E TaiChi White支持DDR5规格,最高可超频至8200 MHz,总容量最大达256GB(单根 64GB),并同时兼容英特尔XMP与AMD EXPO超频预设,方便用户一键释放内存性能。

华擎白色“太极”主板X870E首发4299元:万兆有线、内置Wi-Fi7无线网卡

存储扩展上,主板提供4个M.2插槽,其中1个支持PCIe Gen5x4通道,传输速率高达128Gb/s,其余3个为Hyper M.2 Gen4 x4插槽,所有M.2位均配备独立散热片,以保障高速读写时的热量释放。

散热设计方面,主板采用智能冷却方案,VRM与电感区域覆盖大面积铝合金散热器,确保高负载工作时的温控表现;同时提供PWM/DC风扇接口及热敏电阻接针,用户可通过Fan-Tastic Tuning工具自定义风扇曲线,在散热效能与静音之间取得平衡。

华擎白色“太极”主板X870E首发4299元:万兆有线、内置Wi-Fi7无线网卡

网络连接同样旗舰级配置:内置Wi-Fi 7无线网卡,支持6GHz/5GHz/2.4GHz三频段,提供更低延迟的无线传输;有线部分则搭载AQUANTIA万兆网卡,满足高速网络需求。

接口拓展极为丰富,板载共计21个USB接口,其中包括2个USB4接口,支持最高40Gbps传输速率;前置提供USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Type-C接针,速率达20Gbps;其余多个USB 3.2/2.0接口可满足外设及存储设备的大量接入需求。整体来看,X870E TaiChi White在性能、散热与扩展性上均达到旗舰水准,是高端白色装机方案的理想选择。

购买链接:京东(4299元)

华擎白色“太极”主板X870E首发4299元:万兆有线、内置Wi-Fi7无线网卡

Continue Reading华擎白色“太极”主板X870E首发4299元:万兆有线、内置Wi-Fi7无线网卡