The supreme court didn’t rule on the definition of ‘a woman’ – this is what its judgment does mean | Sam Fowles

The judges had to interpret the law as set down by parliament. But it must be remembered this is not an abstract debate; it concerns real peopleSam Fowles is a barristerThe supreme court, headlines say, has ruled on “the definition of a woman”. Except ...

Continue ReadingThe supreme court didn’t rule on the definition of ‘a woman’ – this is what its judgment does mean | Sam Fowles