arXiv:2608.20384v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal affect and behaviour classifiers that fuse heterogeneous text, audio, and visual streams must simultaneously achieve competitive accuracy and produce human-understandable explanations of the cues driving their decisions — a dual objective that current high-capacity models, notably Transformers, only partially address. While Transformers attain strong predictive performance, their distributed representations and deep nonlinearity make it difficult to assign meaningful importance weights to individual multimodal features, limiting their use in trust-sensitive applications such as clinical affect monitoring and educational assessment. We address this gap by developing a framework based on tree-based ensembles that balances accuracy and interpretability. The framework encodes each modality into tokens, extracts and clusters concepts to reduce dimensionality, routes the fused modalities through tree-based ensemble classifiers, and interprets trends using a novel modified feature importance metric. The modified importance reduces the influence of the negative class in binary classification tasks, thereby improving indicator or marker detection. The proposed tree-based ensembles — Linear Discriminant Tree (LDT), Linear Discriminant Forest (LDF), and Linear Discriminant AdaBoost (LDAB) — achieve F1-mod gains of 4.3% over the Multimodal Transformer and accuracy gains of 3.0% over the primary interpretable multimodal baseline, Interpretable Multimodal Routing (IMR). The proposed multimodal feature importance extracts salient inter-modal concepts with substantially higher human-annotator agreement scores than default feature importance (62.2% vs. 43.2% on IEMOCAP; 46.7% vs. 32.1% on CMU-MOSI).

With a fixed deadline and design resources committed elsewhere, Stampli used Codex and ChatGPT Work to compress weeks of launch production into days.

Introducing AI Futures, a new OpenAI blog exploring how transformative AI could reshape power, governance, the economy, and individual freedom.

arXiv:2608.18078v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: This position paper argues that AI agents with chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities are predisposed to exhibit collusive behavior and should be required to obtain behavioral certification before making decisions that affect economic markets. This is because integrating these agents into society could collapse the legal evidentiary distinction between competition and collusion among independent firms without eroding the economic harm distinction. Experiments with DeepSeek-R1 agents in the Bertrand oligopoly pricing domain reveal a tendency towards tacit collusion that persists even when humans prompt the agents not to collude. We further show that the chain-of-thought of these agents can be steered toward either extremely collusive or highly competitive behavior in a way that is not semantically detectable by another LLM analyzing the reasoning traces. As a result, deploying reasoning agents for market decisions leads to collusive economic outcomes without any evidence of conspiracy or intent. Thus, certification based on observed behavior in representative situations is necessary to prevent collusion. We provide preliminary evidence that such agents can be steered in a generalizable way toward efficient competitive equilibria. However, developing a comprehensive behavioral certification will be required before these models can be deployed in real-world markets while ensuring their stability and efficiency.